Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

‘Veggie burger’ ban: bad for consumers and climate

Jytte Guteland 20th October 2020

The meat industry wants terms such as ‘veggie burger’ banned. This is less about confusion, more about competition.

veggie burger, vegetarian, vegan
Jytte Guteland

This week the European Parliament will vote on the common agricultural policy. We want a sustainable CAP, aligned with the Paris agreement and the European Climate Law, on which the parliament recently adopted a position. Judging from what´s on the table, however, we are far from it. 

One small aspect of the CAP could have a big impact. It’s the issue of whether to ban ‘meaty’ terms—such as ‘burger and ‘sausage’—for vegetarian products, and further restrict marketing of plant-based alternatives to dairy.

Dietary choices

Products such as ‘veggie burger’ or ‘plant based-steak’ have in some cases been on the market for decades. Consumers are familiar with these names, which help to support their dietary choices. 

Current European Union denominations and labelling rules, as laid out in the Food Information to Consumers Regulation, are clear and adequate. Additional restrictions would harm the competitiveness of plant-based food producers—a growing contributor to European jobs and investment—which have built brands, product portfolios, intellectual property rights and strong customer bases on these familiar terms.  

Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content.


We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Thank you!

Please check your inbox and click on the link in the confirmation email to complete your newsletter subscription.

.

Rather than genuinely caring about consumers making the right choices, it seems the meat industry is worried about the competition from plant-based products. As a frequent consumer of the latter, it never crossed my mind that the names could be confusing. 

In fact, the evidence indicates consumers are not misled by plant-based products. In one survey, 95 per cent of German consumers reported that they never bought the wrong product because they confused plant-based with animal-based food.  

There would be no problem in adding descriptions or qualifiers to make the origin of the products even clearer—this reflects current market practice in any case. It would not involve the European Parliament taking away product names with which European citizens are already familiar. A recent survey by the BEUC, the European Consumer Organisation, found that over 68 per cent of consumers from 11 European countries supported ‘meaty’ names for plant-based food products, as long as they were clearly labelled as plant-based or vegetarian.

Nearly 100,000 people across Europe have signed petitions opposing these proposals. A diverse range of civil-society organisations has also made clear their opposition.

Firm position

The European Parliament recently adopted its position on the European Climate Law, cornerstone of the European Green Deal. As rapporteur I was happy that we obtained a commitment to a 60 per cent reduction of greenhouse-gas emissions by 2030, compared with 1990. With this target the parliament takes a firm position to bring Europe’s climate efforts more in line with science and our citizens, who want Europe to reach the climate-neutrality objective and to respect the Paris agreement.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

Food has a major role to play in reaching this target—so the Farm to Fork Strategy is at the heart of the Green Deal. Agriculture will have to contribute considerably to the 2050 and upcoming 2030 climate targets. It is responsible for 10.3 per cent of the EU’s GHG emissions and nearly 70 per cent of these come from the animal sector. 

The Farm to Fork Strategy aims to achieve a sustainable food system that can bring environmental, health and social benefits, offer economic gains and ensure that a recovery from the pandemic puts Europe on to a sustainable path. The strategy includes plans to promote plant-based diets, to reduce not only the risk of life-threatening diseases but also the environmental impact of the food system.

Restrictive labelling would not only hinder the development of the plant-based industry. It would go counter to the objectives of the strategy and the Sustainable Healthy Diets: Guiding Principles document jointly issued by the Food and Agriculture Organization and the World Health Organization.

Encouraging trends

It should not only be up to us as individuals to save the climate: the sectors and countries that emit the most must also contribute the most. But we need to embrace and encourage trends that make it easier for consumers to make environmentally friendly choices. Europeans are becoming increasingly conscious of the environmental, ethical and health impacts of their diet and are starting to change their food consumption accordingly. The number of vegetarians, vegans and ‘flexitarians’ is increasing.

EU annual meat consumption is projected to decline by 1.1 kilogrammes per capita by 2030. The number of flexitarians is increasing across all generations. In particular, the plant-based market share of the total ‘meat’ market tends to be relatively high in western Europe: in the Netherlands and Belgium it is 11 per cent, in Germany 9 per cent, in Italy 7 per cent, and in Sweden 5 per cent.

Banning veggie burgers and other ‘meaty’ names would risk making the European Parliament appear distant from European citizens. We should not confiscate these names for plant-based products, in the mistaken belief it would show solidarity with farmers or producers in the meat sector or even a respect for tradition. The status quo is fair.

Jytte Guteland

Jytte Guteland MEP is co-ordinator for the Socialists and Democrats of the European Parliament Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. She is currently rapporteur for the EU Climate Law.

Home ・ Economy ・ ‘Veggie burger’ ban: bad for consumers and climate

Most Popular Posts

Boris Johnson, Brexit, Conservative,conservatism Boris Johnson: blustering onPaul Mason
deglobalisation,deglobalization,Davos Getting deglobalisation rightJoseph Stiglitz
schools,Sweden,Swedish,voucher,choice Sweden’s schools: Milton Friedman’s wet dreamLisa Pelling
world order,Russia,China,Europe,United States,US The coming world orderMarc Saxer
south working,remote work ‘South working’: the future of remote workAntonio Aloisi and Luisa Corazza

Most Recent Posts

public services,public service,women,public service workers Public services should not be the victims of inflationIrene Ovonji-Odida
gdp,gross domestic product Let’s count what really mattersJayati Ghosh
green transition,just transition,fossil fuel,energy transition,Ukraine,Russia Ukraine and the geopolitics of the energy transitionBéla Galgóczi and Paolo Tomassetti
energy,efficiency,generation,solar,price,inflation From subsidising energy to reducing dependenceHans Dubois
SPO,Rendi-Wagner,Austria,social democratic,social democrat,social democracy A social-democratic decade ahead?Robert Misik

Other Social Europe Publications

National recovery and resilience plans
The transatlantic relationship
Women and the coronavirus crisis
RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?
US election 2020

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

Towards a new Minimum Wage Policy in Germany and Europe: WSI minimum wage report 2022

The past year has seen a much higher political profile for the issue of minimum wages, not only in Germany, which has seen fresh initiatives to tackle low pay, but also in those many other countries in Europe that have embarked on substantial and sustained increases in statutory minimum wages. One key benchmark in determining what should count as an adequate minimum wage is the threshold of 60 per cent of the median wage, a ratio that has also played a role in the European Commission's proposals for an EU-level policy on minimum wages. This year's WSI Minimum Wage Report highlights the feasibility of achieving minimum wages that meet this criterion, given the political will. And with an increase to 12 euro per hour planned for autumn 2022, Germany might now find itself promoted from laggard to minimum-wage trailblazer.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

ETUI/ETUC conference: A Blueprint for Equality

Join us at the three-day hybrid conference ‘A blueprint for equality’ (22-24 June).

The case against inequality has already been strongly articulated. Inequality is not just incidental to a particular crisis but a structural problem created by an economic model. Now is the time to explore what real equality should look like.

As a media partner of this event, Social Europe is delighted to invite you to this three-day conference, organised by the ETUI and ETUC. More than 90 speakers from the academic world, international organisations, trade unions and NGOs will participate, including the economist Thomas Piketty and the European commissioner Nicolas Schmit.


MORE INFOMATION HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Minimum wages in 2022: annual review

Nominal minimum wage rates rose significantly in 2022, compared with 2021. In 20 of the 21 European Union member states with statutory minimum wages, rates increased. When inflation is taken into account, however, the minimum wage increased in real terms in only six member states. If current inflation trends continue, minimum wages will barely grow at all in real terms in any country in 2022.


AVAILABLE HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

EU Care Atlas: a new interactive data map showing how care deficits affect the gender earnings gap in the EU

Browse through the EU Care Atlas, a new interactive data map to help uncover what the statistics are often hiding: how care deficits directly feed into the gender earnings gap.

While attention is often focused on the gender pay gap (13%), the EU Care Atlas brings to light the more worrisome and complex picture of women’s economic inequalities. The pay gap is just one of three main elements that explain the overall earnings gap, which is estimated at 36.7%. The EU Care Atlas illustrates the urgent need to look beyond the pay gap and understand the interplay between the overall earnings gap and care imbalances.


BROWSE THROUGH THE MAP

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us on social media

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube