Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Will Europe deliver on corporate responsibility?

Isabelle Schömann 22nd February 2022

The EU must enforce mandatory due diligence on corporations and their supply chains and involve workers in its strategy.

supply chains,mandatory due diligence,human rights,workers' rights
This shouldn’t be the source of your chocolate—a child labourer harvesting cocoa in Ghana (Charles William Adofo / shutterstock.com)

Last June, the European Commission was due to unveil a proposal obliging businesses to ensure human rights throughout their operations and global supply chains. Yet despite sustained pressure from the European Trade Union Confederation, nothing came forward. The draft directive on human-rights due diligence and sustainable corporate governance is 237 days late—but, at last, the commission is due to publish a proposal tomorrow.

Why should due diligence be so difficult for the EU when member states are already taking action? Back in 2017, France passed a law on a corporate duty of vigilance and the issue was included in the coalition agreement among the German government partners in December last year. Action by these two major powers should send a clear signal to the commission.

In April 2021, the Belgian parliament voted in favour of a law on due diligence. In December the Dutch government announced that it would introduce national legislation—due to the ‘disappointing’ delay at EU level. Other EU countries, including Finland and Denmark, have also committed to due-diligence rules. The political momentum is there and must translate into tough EU-wide action.

Key demands

A European directive on mandatory human-rights due diligence and responsible business conduct is urgent and must be robust. The ETUC has set out its key demands.

Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content.


We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Thank you!

Please check your inbox and click on the link in the confirmation email to complete your newsletter subscription.

.

The EU law must oblige effective due diligence covering companies’ activities and business relationships, including their entire supply and subcontracting chains. Public oversight should guarantee compliance by business and their suppliers.

Business obligations must cover human rights, including workers’ and trade union rights, as referred to in European and international law. EU values and principles must be the compass.

Trade unions and workers’ representatives, including European works councils, must be fully informed and proactively involved throughout the whole due diligence process, as corporate stakeholders. Workers must be empowered to take action against human-rights violations, providing effective sanctions, remedies and access to justice for victims, including trade unions.

Last but not least, companies must be held accountable for the impacts of their operations if they fail to respect their due-diligence obligations, regardless of joint and several liability frameworks where two or more parties are involved.

Profits before lives

Back in January 2020, the ETUC had highlighted the urgency of legislation, given multinational companies’ failure to act responsibly in guaranteeing workers’ rights and protecting the environment. There was the 2013 collapse of the Rana Plaza factory in Bangladesh, where workers were manufacturing clothing for major European retailers. There were the reports of children used to harvest cocoa and of items produced by forced labour in China appearing in European supermarkets. Companies continue to put profits before lives when it comes to sourcing cheap goods.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

Multinationals operate through complex cross-border subcontracting and supply chains. Voluntary pledges have proved ineffective and binding rules are the only way to ensure they take responsibility for the welfare of workers and their own environmental impact, not only in the European Union but around the world. Research by international human-rights monitors, including the International Labour Organization, the Council of Europe and the International Trade Union Congress (with its Global Rights Index), confirms that violations of workers’ and trade union rights are still on the increase, committed not only by oppressive governments but also by well-known companies.

In December, four members of the European Parliament from different political parties wrote to the commission seeking clarity about the role of its Regulatory Scrutiny Board (RSB) in delaying the draft legislation. They insisted on the clear public interest in disclosing the reasons behind the RSB’s rejection of an initiative which had garnered almost half a million responses in the course of public consultation.

A month earlier, a group of organisations, including the ETUC, had complained to the European ombudsman of maladministration on the part of the commission, which had apparently disregarded more than 100,000 public submissions missing from the consultation website. The complainants included the Austrian Chamber of Labour, the Austrian Trade Union Federation (ÖGB), the European Coalition for Corporate Justice, Friends of the Earth Europe, SumOfUs and WeMoveEU.

The ombudsman promised to submit the complaint to the commission. But so far there has been no reaction from the latter quarter, again demonstrating the lack of accountability and reluctance to debate with trade unions and international non-governmental organisations.

Stalling action

In the meantime, some industry lobbies have publicly proclaimed their success in stalling action, raising serious questions about the objectivity of the RSB. The MEPs demanded disclosure of all correspondence and meetings between board members and external stakeholders, reflecting the degree of concern within the European Parliament about the integrity of EU law-making.

What was reported as a ‘big win’ for corporate lobbyists was condemned by the ETUC and by human-rights and environmental INGOs, which revealed in June 2021 how industry lobbyists were working to block legislation or, more insidiously, weaken its impact. European citizens cannot accept that laws are being tweaked and tailored to protect profits at the expense of human lives or to enable climate pollution and corporate corruption.

Every day of delay is one more day when workers’, trade union and other human rights are abused and trampled on. Over 80 per cent of citizens across multiple EU countries want strong laws to hold companies liable for human-rights and environmental violations. A YouGov poll in nine member states late last year found 86 per cent of respondents agreed that companies which cause or contribute to human-rights violations and environmental crimes around the world should be rendered legally liable.

Earlier this month, more than 100 companies, investors and business associations called for urgent legislation applying a risk-based approach to the whole value chain. Reputable businesses should welcome a clear framework of rules, to create a level playing-field for all companies operating in Europe.

Strong tools

EU mandatory due-diligence legislation is vital to improve the environmental and human-rights impacts of EU-based corporations across the world and to provide strong tools so victims of abuses can hold them accountable. It is high time to put the interests of people and the planet before profit.

The commission must table an ambitious proposal to make a clear break with current practices of voluntary codes of conduct. It must seize this unique opportunity to position itself in a global context by coming forward with legally-binding rules on human rights, due diligence and corporate accountability—showing that the EU is serious about defending workers’, trade union and broader human and environmental rights.

This column is sponsored by the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC).

Isabelle Schömann

Isabelle Schömann was elected confederal secretary of the European Trade Union Confederation at the 14th congress in Vienna in May 2019. From 2005 to 2016, she was a senior researcher with the European Trade Union Institute in Brussels.

Home ・ Politics ・ Will Europe deliver on corporate responsibility?

Most Popular Posts

schools,Sweden,Swedish,voucher,choice Sweden’s schools: Milton Friedman’s wet dreamLisa Pelling
world order,Russia,China,Europe,United States,US The coming world orderMarc Saxer
south working,remote work ‘South working’: the future of remote workAntonio Aloisi and Luisa Corazza
Russia,Putin,assets,oligarchs Seizing the assets of Russian oligarchsBranko Milanovic
Russians,support,war,Ukraine Why do Russians support the war against Ukraine?Svetlana Erpyleva

Most Recent Posts

trade,values,Russia,Ukraine,globalisation Peace and trade—a new perspectiveGustav Horn
biodiversity,COP15,China,climate COP15: negotiations must come out of the shadowsSandrine Maljean-Dubois
reproductive rights,abortion,hungary,eastern europe,united states,us,poland The uneven battlefield of reproductive rightsAndrea Pető
LNG,EIB,liquefied natural gas,European Investment Bank Ukraine is no reason to invest in gasXavier Sol
schools,Sweden,Swedish,voucher,choice Sweden’s schools: Milton Friedman’s wet dreamLisa Pelling

Other Social Europe Publications

The transatlantic relationship
Women and the coronavirus crisis
RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?
US election 2020
Corporate taxation in a globalised era

ETUI advertisement

Bilan social / Social policy in the EU: state of play 2021 and perspectives

The new edition of the Bilan social 2021, co-produced by the European Social Observatory (OSE) and the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), reveals that while EU social policy-making took a blow in 2020, 2021 was guided by the re-emerging social aspirations of the European Commission and the launch of several important initiatives. Against the background of Covid-19, climate change and the debate on the future of Europe, the French presidency of the Council of the EU and the von der Leyen commission must now be closely scrutinised by EU citizens and social stakeholders.


AVAILABLE HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Living and working in Europe 2021

The Covid-19 pandemic continued to be a defining force in 2021, and Eurofound continued its work of examining and recording the many and diverse impacts across the EU. Living and working in Europe 2021 provides a snapshot of the changes to employment, work and living conditions in Europe. It also summarises the agency’s findings on issues such as gender equality in employment, wealth inequality and labour shortages. These will have a significant bearing on recovery from the pandemic, resilience in the face of the war in Ukraine and a successful transition to a green and digital future.


AVAILABLE HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

EU Care Atlas: a new interactive data map showing how care deficits affect the gender earnings gap in the EU

Browse through the EU Care Atlas, a new interactive data map to help uncover what the statistics are often hiding: how care deficits directly feed into the gender earnings gap.

While attention is often focused on the gender pay gap (13%), the EU Care Atlas brings to light the more worrisome and complex picture of women’s economic inequalities. The pay gap is just one of three main elements that explain the overall earnings gap, which is estimated at 36.7%. The EU Care Atlas illustrates the urgent need to look beyond the pay gap and understand the interplay between the overall earnings gap and care imbalances.


BROWSE THROUGH THE MAP

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

Towards a new Minimum Wage Policy in Germany and Europe: WSI minimum wage report 2022

The past year has seen a much higher political profile for the issue of minimum wages, not only in Germany, which has seen fresh initiatives to tackle low pay, but also in those many other countries in Europe that have embarked on substantial and sustained increases in statutory minimum wages. One key benchmark in determining what should count as an adequate minimum wage is the threshold of 60 per cent of the median wage, a ratio that has also played a role in the European Commission's proposals for an EU-level policy on minimum wages. This year's WSI Minimum Wage Report highlights the feasibility of achieving minimum wages that meet this criterion, given the political will. And with an increase to 12 euro per hour planned for autumn 2022, Germany might now find itself promoted from laggard to minimum-wage trailblazer.


FREE DOWNLOAD

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us on social media

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube