Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Making globalisation fair

Reiner Hoffmann 9th March 2020

Enterprises must address—and government more actively demand of them—their observance of human rights.

human rights due diligence
Reiner Hoffmann

Should enterprises be legally required to observe human rights, within their businesses and along their value chains? The German federal government has been searching for an answer to this question for months.

From an ethical point of view, the obligation has always existed: human rights are universal, inalienable and indivisible; they must be observed and protected. The problem is how to translate this moral obligation into concrete corporate action.

This question is also not new. Twenty-one years ago, the then secretary-general of the United Nations, Kofi Annan, used the World Economic Forum in Davos to emphasise to the business elite that the economic possibilities of markets across the globe were intertwined with corporate responsibility to support social and ecological development in the countries concerned.

In 2011, the UN adopted Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. These describe in detail corporate responsibility to observe human rights along global value chains.

Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content.


We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Thank you!

Please check your inbox and click on the link in the confirmation email to complete your newsletter subscription.

.

Voluntary commitment

Over three years ago, the German government issued the National Action Plan (NAP) on implementation of the principles. This was preceded by an intense two-year process, in which businesses, trade unions and civil society were given the opportunity to contribute their views. Yet the government could only bring itself to formulate one expectation for enterprises as to due diligence on human rights—it amounted to a voluntary commitment.

Even at the time, trade unions doubted whether this would really lead to greater care in observing human rights. These doubts have been clearly confirmed through the monitoring of the NAP: in a representative sample of approximately 400 businesses surveyed, each with more than 500 employees, the government discovered that not even 20 per cent exercised human-rights due diligence.

The grand-coalition agreement describes what should come next: the federal government intends to take legislative action before the end of the current legislative period. In addition, it plans to back an EU-wide regulation if the voluntary commitment of enterprises proves insufficient.

Instead of making a quick start on drafting legislation, however, the government is getting bogged down in a pedantic debate about the method and contents of the survey and is arguing about the expediency of statutory regulations. Political actors at the Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, in particular, still cling to their faith in voluntary commitments.

Statutory regulation

Two federal ministers, from the Christian-democrat and social-democrat parties respectively, however oppose them by taking the coalition agreement seriously. These are the minister for economic co-operation and development, Gerd Müller, and the minister of labour and social affairs, Hubertus Heil. Both are pushing for a statutory regulation—they have good reasons to do so.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

To put it plainly, voluntary commitments have failed. If even filling out a survey is too much for enterprises to manage, this begs the question whether those responsible are even aware of the scope of their responsibility. And if corporate responsibility to observe human rights has been on the agenda of socially and ecologically responsible business leadership for 21 years, we should ask why business has not done more in this time.

Two decades are enough to integrate this responsibility into enterprises’ risk management. Those who assert that global value chains are unmanageable should remember that they were created by the enterprises themselves. It can be assumed that, with regard to product quality, all possible risks in supply chains will be examined. Shouldn’t the same apply to the quality of life and working conditions of the people working in them?

Well-publicised disasters

Well-publicised disasters have shown this is not always the case. In 2013, 1,135 people were killed and 2,438 were injured, some of them severely, in the collapse of the Rana Plaza factory building in Bangladesh—the fashion brands whose products were manufactured there should have been well aware of the textile workers’ poor conditions.

Chocolate production is also an industry where many producers violate human rights every day. In west Africa alone, according to the International Labour Organization, approximately two million children harvest cocoa for large chocolate manufacturers under exploitative conditions.

Dam breaches, factory fires and collapses become public knowledge in Germany. But many more human-rights violations go under the radar.

Competitive disadvantage

Though such carelessness is the opposite of diligence, we cannot accuse business on the whole of a careless approach to human rights. While there are still occasional comments from some companies doubting their responsibility, numerous enterprises have been minimising risks of human-rights violations in value chains for a long time.

This approach entails greater effort and thus may be somewhat less profitable. Unfortunately, such enterprises are then at a clear competitive disadvantage, as long as their competitors can commit too few or no resources to protecting human rights effectively.

Müller has attempted, through several initiatives in various sectors, to incentivise enterprises to change course in industries where human rights are particularly at risk. These initiatives, the most prominent being the Textile Partnership, have certainly had respectable results. But most enterprises are still not participating. Only a statutory obligation can ensure that sensible and effective initiatives and partnerships gain momentum and compliant firms need not continue at a competitive disadvantage.

A further reason why many enterprises endorse a supply-chain law is the current climate of legal uncertainty. Businesses which do not know how to observe the rights at issue may currently be safe from punishment but not from other damages. The courts are already an option for claimants to bring civil action against enterprises for their negligence of human rights. The damage to reputation incurred here is usually higher than the financial penalties.

Not binding

To any doubters in the German government, I would recommend reading the report of the advisory consortium responsible for monitoring the NAP. In 2018, this said the NAP was unknown even in large enterprises and it played a secondary role in business practice, because it was not binding. There could be no clearer statement of the need for statutory regulations.

The government should take the calls of reputable enterprises for a due-diligence law seriously and not dismiss them as a public-relations stunt. Of course, businesses will want to advertise using the concept of sustainability in future. And if these promises are backed by sustainable action, there is nothing wrong with such adverts—quite the contrary.

Supported by the chancellor, Angela Merkel, the government provided important new ideas for ensuring fair globalisation as part of the group of the seven most industrialised countries (G7) in 2015 and at the G20 in 2017. This commitment enjoyed broad international approval and was supported actively by trade unions. It should be continued under the pending German EU presidency.

Germany could make an important contribution by enforcing binding rules—judiciously combined with initiatives by non-governmental organisations—in particular as these affect employees along global value chains. That contribution would in itself be an example of fair globalisation.

Reiner Hoffmann

Reiner Hoffmann is chair of the Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund (DGB).

Home ・ Politics ・ Making globalisation fair

Most Popular Posts

schools,Sweden,Swedish,voucher,choice Sweden’s schools: Milton Friedman’s wet dreamLisa Pelling
world order,Russia,China,Europe,United States,US The coming world orderMarc Saxer
south working,remote work ‘South working’: the future of remote workAntonio Aloisi and Luisa Corazza
Russia,Putin,assets,oligarchs Seizing the assets of Russian oligarchsBranko Milanovic
Russians,support,war,Ukraine Why do Russians support the war against Ukraine?Svetlana Erpyleva

Most Recent Posts

Sakharov,nuclear,Khrushchev Unhappy birthday, Andrei SakharovNina L Khrushcheva
Gazprom,Putin,Nordstream,Putin,Schröder How the public loses out when politicians cash inKatharina Pistor
defence,europe,spending Ukraine and Europe’s defence spendingValerio Alfonso Bruno and Adriano Cozzolino
North Atlantic Treaty Organization,NATO,Ukraine The Ukraine war and NATO’s renewed credibilityPaul Rogers
transnational list,European constituency,European elections,European public sphere A European constituency for a European public sphereDomènec Ruiz Devesa

Other Social Europe Publications

The transatlantic relationship
Women and the coronavirus crisis
RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?
US election 2020
Corporate taxation in a globalised era

Eurofound advertisement

Living and working in Europe 2021

The Covid-19 pandemic continued to be a defining force in 2021, and Eurofound continued its work of examining and recording the many and diverse impacts across the EU. Living and working in Europe 2021 provides a snapshot of the changes to employment, work and living conditions in Europe. It also summarises the agency’s findings on issues such as gender equality in employment, wealth inequality and labour shortages. These will have a significant bearing on recovery from the pandemic, resilience in the face of the war in Ukraine and a successful transition to a green and digital future.


AVAILABLE HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

EU Care Atlas: a new interactive data map showing how care deficits affect the gender earnings gap in the EU

Browse through the EU Care Atlas, a new interactive data map to help uncover what the statistics are often hiding: how care deficits directly feed into the gender earnings gap.

While attention is often focused on the gender pay gap (13%), the EU Care Atlas brings to light the more worrisome and complex picture of women’s economic inequalities. The pay gap is just one of three main elements that explain the overall earnings gap, which is estimated at 36.7%. The EU Care Atlas illustrates the urgent need to look beyond the pay gap and understand the interplay between the overall earnings gap and care imbalances.


BROWSE THROUGH THE MAP

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

Towards a new Minimum Wage Policy in Germany and Europe: WSI minimum wage report 2022

The past year has seen a much higher political profile for the issue of minimum wages, not only in Germany, which has seen fresh initiatives to tackle low pay, but also in those many other countries in Europe that have embarked on substantial and sustained increases in statutory minimum wages. One key benchmark in determining what should count as an adequate minimum wage is the threshold of 60 per cent of the median wage, a ratio that has also played a role in the European Commission's proposals for an EU-level policy on minimum wages. This year's WSI Minimum Wage Report highlights the feasibility of achieving minimum wages that meet this criterion, given the political will. And with an increase to 12 euro per hour planned for autumn 2022, Germany might now find itself promoted from laggard to minimum-wage trailblazer.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Bilan social / Social policy in the EU: state of play 2021 and perspectives

The new edition of the Bilan social 2021, co-produced by the European Social Observatory (OSE) and the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), reveals that while EU social policy-making took a blow in 2020, 2021 was guided by the re-emerging social aspirations of the European Commission and the launch of several important initiatives. Against the background of Covid-19, climate change and the debate on the future of Europe, the French presidency of the Council of the EU and the von der Leyen commission must now be closely scrutinised by EU citizens and social stakeholders.


AVAILABLE HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us on social media

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube