Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Euro Union – Quo Vadis?

Jörg Bibow 2nd July 2015 4 Comments

Joerg Bibow

Jörg Bibow

This week a slow-motion train wreck hit the wall in Europe. Greece’s Syriza government came to power earlier this year on a mandate to keep Greece in the euro but end austerity. It was clear from the start that this project could only work out if Greece’s euro partners finally acknowledged that their austerity policies of the past five years had failed and that it was about time to change course and actually start helping Greece to recover.

This was not such an outrageous proposition. Any sane and economically literate person would consider a 25-percent decline in GDP and a youth unemployment rate north of 50 percent as evidence that the utterly brutal troika-imposed austerity experiment had backfired badly. Any European of normal emotional disposition would look at the humanitarian crisis in Greece with horror and shame. Yes, this is really happening in Europe, inside the European Union, in the 21st century! There was a time when Europeans appealed to their common destiny and spelt solidarity in capital letters. There was a time when Europe felt strongly that its future place in the world would only be one of peace and prosperity if the nations and peoples of Europe respected each other and joined forces to act constructively and in unison – “united in diversity”.

Not so anymore. In Berlin, Germany, in Dr. Schäuble’s “parallel universe”, austerity works always and everywhere, and the more the better – no matter what the facts might say on this planet. If anything went wrong in Greece, it must be the Greek’s own fault, 100 percent. Because the Greeks are lazy, corrupt, and untrustworthy – as Germany’s rotten media, plagued by inhumanly stupid economic journalism, have been preaching to the German public for many years now. So the Germans believe what “Mama” Merkel tells them. And the Germans even believe that their finance minister represents unquestionable economic wisdom and rectitude: the only finance minister on earth who understands how to “balance the budget” year after year so as to protect their grandchildren from the evils of debt. These profound illusions and delusions are proving a catastrophe for Europe (and beyond). Once again, the collective folly of the German people risks exposing Europe to the naked forces of barbarism.

What went wrong? Is the simple answer that the ultimate mistake was to let the wicked Greeks have the sound euro in the first place? They cheated, went bust, and now have to pay the price for their crimes; debtors’ prison for generations, right? Better still, expulsion of the wicked would clean to euro currency union and make it fitter for the future, as many Germans, including their political leaders, seem to believe these days. Too bad they are still mistaking the crisis of an ill-constructed currency union as primarily a “sovereign debt crisis” of one of its smaller members.

No doubt Greece is in crisis, in economic, political, and humanitarian crisis. But the actual crisis in Europe today runs much deeper and is bound to ultimately tear the continent apart unless the actual fractures that undermine the euro get finally addressed. Perhaps the most remarkable thing is that Greece’s euro partners, including other euro debtor nations, practiced unity and solidarity in cursing Greece alone for the ill-fate of their euro project. Beware that throwing ballast off a sinking ship may slow but not prevent the ship from sinking unless the leakage and its underlying causes get fixed too. And you might even capsize quicker if you handle the supposed excess ballast wrongly.

So there still is solidarity, in a way, but the wrong kind of solidarity: solidarity against the Greeks and their unconventional left-wing government, based on the illusion that taxpayers all over Europe are bailing out the lazy Greeks. German Chancellor Angela Merkel even proclaimed that the Greeks were made a “generous offer” – which their current government irresponsibly declined. The supposedly “generous offer” consisted of fresh loans that would have enabled Greece to repay earlier “bail-out” loans, creditors’ self-help rather than actual help for Greece. And of course those fresh “bail-out” loans had strings attached to them, more of the same austerity and structural reform conditions that have already wiped out a quarter of the Greek economy: a primary surplus of 3.5 percent by 2018 rather than 4.5 percent agreed to by the previous government, shrinking GDP by another, say, 8 percent rather than 10 percent or so; how very generous indeed. While widely perceived as generous gifts by European taxpayers to the lazy Greeks, Greece’s official creditors were merely trying to facilitate a roll-over of their ill-inspired bail-outs of creditor country banks of five years ago.

As the IMF correctly diagnosed, Greece was insolvent in 2010. If Greece had defaulted back then, as it should have, creditor country banks would have suffered huge losses. Taxpayers in Germany, France, and the Netherlands, in particular, would have ended up bailing out their reckless bankers, who were responsible for spreading financial ruin across the continent. Instead, a bail-out was imposed on the Greeks, and, as a result of it, today euro area taxpayers, including member states that are poorer than Greece, feel they are getting fleeced by the Greeks whom they have so generously supported all along. What nonsense!

Worse, even the IMF was brought in as part of the con, and hence taxpayers of many developing countries far poorer than Greece are on the hook today for the folly of the authorities involved. Supposedly the Greeks should even feel ashamed for ripping off the rest of the world – and humbly sign off on their generous offer (designed to finish of the job of destroying their economy and society). How very disrespectful of them, as the inventors of democracy, to consider the democratic mandate of their own government as standing above the democratic mandates of their euro partner governments.

And that is of course just another grand illusion. Did the creditor country governments really have a democratic mandate to organize the con trick of getting their banks bailed out and shoulder the Greeks with official debts that could never get repaid, especially as the Greek economy got crushed along the way by brutal austerity? If that was necessary to rescue the euro, lacking any defenses at the time, why do the Greeks alone have to pick up the bill? After sacrificing Greece to save the euro, do Greece’s euro partners really have a democratic mandate today to inflict another economic massacre on Greece instead of organizing proper solidarity? Democracy starts with speaking truth to the people whose interests you purportedly represent. Why do euro area taxpayers believe they have been too generous to those lazy Greeks and can’t possible “help” them even more?

Europe used to see itself as the beacon of democracy in the world. But democracy appears to be the ultimate victim of the crisis of the euro currency union as one people turns against another. The euro as a means to prosperity turned out to be a pipe dream. As a flawed and dysfunctional currency union, it is impoverishing the continent instead. For how much longer will it be a means to secure peace then? It is ludicrous to put the blame for the euro crisis at Greece’s door in particular. Greece’s share of “guilt” for today’s terrific mess is probably similar to Greece’s share in the union’s GDP. Member states share responsibility for the euro blunder. They should act accordingly, in proper solidarity.

Most importantly, in dealing with the legacies of their joint blunders in solidarity, they need to look towards the future and remember what the European ideal was all about. It is high time to re-launch the euro on a sounder footing, beginning with organizing investment rather than insane austerity. Through joint investment into their common future Europeans need to refocus on thriving for higher productivity, efficiency, and living standards – rather than getting entrapped in a race to the bottom in the name of “competitiveness” (misconceived as underbidding each other in terms of wages and social protection). For Europe there isn’t all that much room to fall further from here without unleashing mayhem. Greece may be the final wake-up call.

Jörg Bibow

Jörg Bibow is Professor of Economics at Skidmore College and a Research Associate at the Levy Institute at Bard College. His research focuses on central banking and financial systems and the effects of monetary policy on economic performance, especially the monetary policies of the Bundesbank and the European Central Bank.

Home ・ Politics ・ Euro Union – Quo Vadis?

Most Popular Posts

schools,Sweden,Swedish,voucher,choice Sweden’s schools: Milton Friedman’s wet dreamLisa Pelling
world order,Russia,China,Europe,United States,US The coming world orderMarc Saxer
south working,remote work ‘South working’: the future of remote workAntonio Aloisi and Luisa Corazza
Russia,Putin,assets,oligarchs Seizing the assets of Russian oligarchsBranko Milanovic
Russians,support,war,Ukraine Why do Russians support the war against Ukraine?Svetlana Erpyleva

Most Recent Posts

biodiversity,COP15,China,climate COP15: negotiations must come out of the shadowsSandrine Maljean-Dubois
reproductive rights,abortion,hungary,eastern europe,united states,us,poland The uneven battlefield of reproductive rightsAndrea Pető
LNG,EIB,liquefied natural gas,European Investment Bank Ukraine is no reason to invest in gasXavier Sol
schools,Sweden,Swedish,voucher,choice Sweden’s schools: Milton Friedman’s wet dreamLisa Pelling
Fit for 55,access to justice,Aarhus convention Access to justice in the ‘Fit for 55’ packageFrederik Hafen

Other Social Europe Publications

The transatlantic relationship
Women and the coronavirus crisis
RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?
US election 2020
Corporate taxation in a globalised era

Eurofound advertisement

Living and working in Europe 2021

The Covid-19 pandemic continued to be a defining force in 2021, and Eurofound continued its work of examining and recording the many and diverse impacts across the EU. Living and working in Europe 2021 provides a snapshot of the changes to employment, work and living conditions in Europe. It also summarises the agency’s findings on issues such as gender equality in employment, wealth inequality and labour shortages. These will have a significant bearing on recovery from the pandemic, resilience in the face of the war in Ukraine and a successful transition to a green and digital future.


AVAILABLE HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

EU Care Atlas: a new interactive data map showing how care deficits affect the gender earnings gap in the EU

Browse through the EU Care Atlas, a new interactive data map to help uncover what the statistics are often hiding: how care deficits directly feed into the gender earnings gap.

While attention is often focused on the gender pay gap (13%), the EU Care Atlas brings to light the more worrisome and complex picture of women’s economic inequalities. The pay gap is just one of three main elements that explain the overall earnings gap, which is estimated at 36.7%. The EU Care Atlas illustrates the urgent need to look beyond the pay gap and understand the interplay between the overall earnings gap and care imbalances.


BROWSE THROUGH THE MAP

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

Towards a new Minimum Wage Policy in Germany and Europe: WSI minimum wage report 2022

The past year has seen a much higher political profile for the issue of minimum wages, not only in Germany, which has seen fresh initiatives to tackle low pay, but also in those many other countries in Europe that have embarked on substantial and sustained increases in statutory minimum wages. One key benchmark in determining what should count as an adequate minimum wage is the threshold of 60 per cent of the median wage, a ratio that has also played a role in the European Commission's proposals for an EU-level policy on minimum wages. This year's WSI Minimum Wage Report highlights the feasibility of achieving minimum wages that meet this criterion, given the political will. And with an increase to 12 euro per hour planned for autumn 2022, Germany might now find itself promoted from laggard to minimum-wage trailblazer.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Bilan social / Social policy in the EU: state of play 2021 and perspectives

The new edition of the Bilan social 2021, co-produced by the European Social Observatory (OSE) and the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), reveals that while EU social policy-making took a blow in 2020, 2021 was guided by the re-emerging social aspirations of the European Commission and the launch of several important initiatives. Against the background of Covid-19, climate change and the debate on the future of Europe, the French presidency of the Council of the EU and the von der Leyen commission must now be closely scrutinised by EU citizens and social stakeholders.


AVAILABLE HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us on social media

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube