Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Brexit, Trade Agreements And The Future Of Labour Standards

Charles Woolfson 19th March 2018

Charles Woolfson

Charles Woolfson

Regulatory standards and their enforcement, particularly of labour standards, are especially vulnerable under the auspices of World Trade Organization (WTO) rules in a context of weak overall global governance. A Brexit in which Britain trades with the EU under WTO rules would provide incentives for a Conservative government to dismantle already weak UK labour rights and standards. Following Brexit, the UK will be a “third country” with respect to the EU. A Canada-style free trade agreement is the most likely outcome of trade negotiations. And, while securing labour standards and decent work comprise a separate chapter (no. 23) of CETA, it recognizes “the right of each Party to set its labour priorities, to establish its levels of labour protection and to adopt or modify its laws and policies accordingly”. Such FTAs involving countries at roughly similar levels of trade union rights preserve “the right to regulate” of both partners and are “voluntary in nature, with no binding outcome”. The record of FTAs when it comes to promoting labour standards in developing countries is even more questionable.

A European model?

Ironically, future trade deals negotiated by the UK may offer an opportunity to foreign parties to leverage significant concessions on regulatory issues. A straw in the wind is the free trade agreement proposed with the US, entailing loosening UK environmental and safety standards. The alternative of a Norway-style agreement offering single market access but requiring acceptance of all existing and new EU regulations (as a “rule-taker”) as well as freedom of movement, is unlikely.

Perhaps understandably, fears of regulatory competition from a post-Brexit Britain are uppermost in the minds of Europe’s leaders. Chief negotiator Michel Barnier (Commission) has warned that a future trade deal “must ensure a level playing field, in terms of competition and state aid, and must encompass safeguards against unfair competitive advantages through, inter alia, fiscal, social and environmental dumping”. He adds: “It is up to the British to tell us whether they still adhere to the European model…their answer is important because it directs the discussion on our future partnership and the conditions of its ratification”.

In response, UK Chancellor Philip Hammond has denied that the Conservative government wants to turn the UK into a deregulated, Singapore-style economy. Post-Brexit Britain would maintain a “social, economic and cultural model that is recognizably European”. By contrast, Boris Johnson has argued for the enticing prospects awaiting a deregulated post-Brexit Britain, condemning the Commission for “trussing the nations together in a gigantic and ever-tightening cat’s cradle of red tape”.

Johnson’s characteristically colourful intervention forced Theresa May in her much-heralded “Florence speech” to reassert that “regulatory issues are crucial”. The Prime Minister affirmed “we share a commitment to high regulatory standards. People in Britain do not want shoddy goods, shoddy services, a poor environment or exploitative working practices and I can never imagine them thinking those things to be acceptable”. Yet May’s now almost-forgotten awkward flirtation with the issue of sub-standard employment in the Taylor Review had as much to do with her long-standing anti-immigrant animus, especially towards those deemed as “illegal”, as with any desire to maintain decent work.

Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content.


We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Thank you!

Please check your inbox and click on the link in the confirmation email to complete your newsletter subscription.

.

Again, David Davis, the Brexit minister, has recently reiterated that the UK is not seeking to engage in an “Anglo-Saxon race to the bottom” in environmental and labour standards. Such assurances are contradicted by internal government policy proposals from the Department for Business, Environment and Industrial Strategy referring to “maximizing regulatory opportunities” to boost the UK economy following Brexit, specifically mentioning the potential for removing employment protections. May’s notion of “managed divergence” with EU rules based on pre-existing “matching” standards as a starting point seems either naïve or disingenuous.

Racing to the bottom?

For the Commission the resolution of contested views regarding the regulatory contours of post-Brexit Britain requires unilateral regulatory compliance with EU rules and regulations. While Brexit Britain may have “regulatory autonomy” in future, the Commission is seeking to limit its scope via “non-regression clauses.” Whether or not these will prohibit the dilution of the existing labour standards below pre-Brexit levels, especially as new trade deals are sealed, remains to be seen. Reliance on rear-guard protective clauses devised by the Commission as part of a future trade deal may not be enough.

Commission documentation has already warned of the threats posed by future UK “export processing zones” to health and safety standards, the dilution of employee consultation rights in the event of redundancies, not to mention undermining collective bargaining rights. All of this may be dismissed as so much posturing, given the Commission’s own rather questionable record in defending collective bargaining in the ongoing search for European-wide “flexicurity”, especially in the crisis-hit Eurozone countries subjected to austerity interventions from the Troika.

The notion that the Commission can be viewed as an architect of labour deregulation (albeit with the active engagement of national governments) is uncongenial to those who regard the EU as a promoter of good labour standards. Yet little in the EU’s latest renovation of its battered “social model” (the so-called European Pillar of Social Rights) specifically advances European labour standards other than iteratively. At the same time, long-standing problems exist with the crucial EU directive intended to provide fair working conditions for mobile (“posted”) European workers as illustrated by the Laval quartet of judgements of the European Court of Justice. The Court, by favouring market-making over social considerations, has proved weak in protecting labour migrants from exploitative employers. Reform of the directive and other related abuses of cross-border workers is, however, strongly opposed by labour-exporting countries, especially among the newer East European member states such as Poland, Latvia and Lithuania that see the provision of cheap labour as a “competitive advantage” rather than “social dumping”, sowing seeds of future divisions within the EU.

Reversing a “race to the bottom” in labour standards post-Brexit, once underway, will not be easy. Preserving and advancing labour standards will rest primarily on political choices at national level. This can be both a threat and an opportunity. The threat is clear. The opportunity requires an organized labour and trade union movement, cognisant of its traditions of international solidarity, committed to defending labour standards in future trade agreements. This will be a major but not insurmountable challenge in the face of corporate pressure to reverse course.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

Charles Woolfson

Charles Woolfson is Professor emeritus of labour studies at the Institute for Research in Migration, Ethnicity and Society (REMESO), Linköping University, Sweden.

Home ・ Politics ・ Brexit, Trade Agreements And The Future Of Labour Standards

Most Popular Posts

Ukraine,workers' rights,laws,labour,protection,liberalisation,zero hours Ukraine to pass laws wrecking workers’ rightsThomas Rowley and Serhiy Guz
airport chaos,chaos at airports,queues, security, key workers,essential workers Airport chaos: security guards and cleaners still keyMark Bergfeld
China,Ukraine China to the rescue?Branko Milanovic
Boris Johnson, Brexit, Conservative,conservatism Boris Johnson: blustering onPaul Mason
deglobalisation,deglobalization,Davos Getting deglobalisation rightJoseph Stiglitz

Most Recent Posts

labour law,ukraine,trade unions,social dialogue,ILO,International Labour Organization Ukraine could abandon key labour principleThomas Rowley and Serhiy Guz
cars,vehicles,transport,industry,jobs,skills,Europe,retraining Vehicles and just transition—turning the wheelSarah Mewes and Gloria Koepke
hybrid working,working from home,new normal Blurring of boundaries in work’s ‘new normal’Rolf Schmucker
ECB,European Central Bank,Draghi,whatever it takes,euro ‘Whatever it takes’, ten years onLászló Andor and David Rinaldi
pandemic preparedness,pandemic response,financial intermediary fund,FIF,Covid-19 Effective pandemic response must be truly globalMariana Mazzucato and Jayati Ghosh

Other Social Europe Publications

National recovery and resilience plans
The transatlantic relationship
Women and the coronavirus crisis
RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?
US election 2020

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Discover the summer issue of the Progressive Post!

The summer issue of the Progressive Post magazine from FEPS is out! It offers compelling analysis on: the energy-crisis challenge, Ukraine war, western Balkans, enlargement, housing crisis, rural areas, minimum wage and much more!

Almost five months into the war, and against the backdrop of soaring energy prices, rising inflation, a changing international order, rampant disinformation, the Ukrainian refugee emergency and all the other consequences triggered by the Russian war against Ukraine, the EU finds itself at a historic turning point. It must choose between sticking together, taking bold decisions, and acting accordingly—or, on the other side, allowing indecisiveness and divisions to gain the upper hand.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

Towards a new Minimum Wage Policy in Germany and Europe: WSI minimum wage report 2022

The past year has seen a much higher political profile for the issue of minimum wages, not only in Germany, which has seen fresh initiatives to tackle low pay, but also in those many other countries in Europe that have embarked on substantial and sustained increases in statutory minimum wages. One key benchmark in determining what should count as an adequate minimum wage is the threshold of 60 per cent of the median wage, a ratio that has also played a role in the European Commission's proposals for an EU-level policy on minimum wages. This year's WSI Minimum Wage Report highlights the feasibility of achieving minimum wages that meet this criterion, given the political will. And with an increase to 12 euro per hour planned for autumn 2022, Germany might now find itself promoted from laggard to minimum-wage trailblazer.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Workers on the route

Discover the new issue of HesaMag, the health and safety magazine with a European view (aussi disponible en français), published twice a year by the ETUI, and take your seat for an exclusive journey through the day-to-day reality of transport workers across Europe, from Romanian drivers to Dutch dockers and French female flight attendants, just to name a few.


MORE INFORMATION HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Fifth round of the Living, working and Covid-19 e-survey: Living in a new era of uncertainty

The fifth round of Eurofound's e-survey, sampled between March 25th and May 2nd 2022, sheds light on the social and economic situation of people across Europe two years after Covid-19 was first detected on the European continent. It also explores the reality of living in a new era of uncertainty caused by the war in Ukraine, inflation and rising energy prices. The e-survey reveals the heavy toll of the pandemic, with respondents reporting lower trust in institutions than at the onset, poorer mental wellbeing, a rise in unmet healthcare need and an increase in households experiencing energy poverty.


AVAILABLE HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us on social media

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube